ECO/Resin Bonded Anchors
Anchor Type: DMM ECO
anchor
Resin
Type: Resifix 3 plus chemical anchor mortar.
Base
Material: Mass limestone, chosen at random with variables
(i.e. wet, dry).
Placement Date: 28.08.1995
Test
Site: Yordas cave, Kingsdale, Yorkshire.
Test
Equipment Used: Hydraulic Cylinder pump & gauge No. G10067,
10 Tonne.
Testers: R.Laybourn (Hilti) test supervisor.
L.Sykes, C.N.C.C. & N.C.A. M.Lowe, D.C.A. &
N.C.A.
Observers: J.Sloane L.U.G. S.Sykes
M.Y.C.T
Test No.1
Site: Anchor was placed in wall
with film of water on the surface of the wall,
cementation of limestone particles had occurred due to
ingress of water.
Preparation: Cleaned using brush
and compressed air method, difficulty in removing all
the cementation.
Result: Egress of anchor from resin
at 36Kn. Applied load
46.8Kn. |
|
Test No.2
Site: Wet wall with a film of water
on the surface.
Preparation: Wash a brush
combination till clean using 450cc of water, then dried
using absorbent cloth.
Result: Egress of anchor from resin
at 46.8Kn. Applied load
54Kn |
|
Test No.3
Site: Wet wall with film of water
on the surface.
Preparation: Flushed only using
300cc of water.
Result: Egress of anchor from resin
at 25.2Kn. Applied load
29Kn. |
|
Test No.4
Site: Wet wall with film of water
on the surface.
Preparation: Wash & brush
combination till clean using 450cc of water, then dried
using absorbent cloth,
Result: Egress of anchor at 36Kn.
Load applied
54Kn. |
|
Test No.5
Site: Hole drill vertical into
floor block.
Preparation: Washed and brushed
until clean, left full of water. Resin was used to expel
the water.
Result: Egress of anchor at 45Kn.
Load applied 52.2Kn. |
|
Test No.6
Site: Wet limestone, no film of
water present on surface.
Preparation: Wash & brush
combination till clean using 450cc of water, then dried
using absorbent cloth.
RESULT: Egress of anchor at 36Kn.
Load applied 48.6Kn. |
|
Test No.7
Site: Wet limestone no film of
water present.
Preparation: Cleaned using brush
and compressed air, slight cementing of limestone
particles, cleaned as good as possible.
RESULT: Egress of anchor at 23.4Kn.
Load applied
36.8Kn. |
|
Test No.8
Site: Wet crinoidal limestone near
entrance.
Preparation: Wash & brush
combination till clean using 450cc of water,
RESULT: Egress of anchor at 45Kn.
Load applied
50.4Kn. |
|
Test No.9
Site: Wet crinoidal limestone near
entrance,
Preparation: Cleaned using brush
and compressed air, no cementing of limestone particles
present.
RESULT: Egress of anchor at 54Kn.
Load applied
54Kn. |
|
Test No.10
Site: Dry limestone on surface,
ambient temp. 20'C+.
Preparation: Cleaned using brush
and compressed air.
RESULT: Egress of anchor at 34.2Kn.
Load applied
44Kn. |
|
Test No.11
Site: Dry limestone on surface,
ambient temp 20'C+.
Preparation: Cleaned using brush
and compressed air.
RESULT: Egress of anchor at l8Kn.
Load applied
4OKn. |
|
Test No.12
Site: Dry limestone on surface,
ambient temp. 20'C+.
Preparation: Wash & brush
combination till clean using 450cc of water, then dried
using absorbent cloth.
RESULT: Egress of anchor at 34.2Kn,
Load applied
37.8Kn. |
|
From
calculations the WORKING LOAD of the tested anchors would be 11.
46Kn.
From
calculations the PROOF TEST LOAD of the tested anchors would be
l7Kn.
Notes
arising from the tests:
Anchor
deformation starts at approximately 19Kn, and continues to about
4OKn, at a point when it has formed around the test rig attachment.
Egress of anchor, is the point at which definite egress of the
anchor from the resin occurred.
Load
applied, is the maximum load Kn. that the anchor placement held
prior to the failure of that placement.
TEST 3:
When the resin was applied to the hole, the resin colour changed,
this constituted an incorrect mix, thus, the low failure load
achieved. Some of the resin plug was also expelled during the test,
this could indicate that flushing only with water is not sufficient
to remove all the particles of limestone. This anchor did pass the
proof load test.
TEST 9:
There was no egress of this anchor from the resin until the load
54Kn was achieved, at 54Kn a cone of rock around the anchor spalled,
the anchor placement failed violently.
TEST 11:
Egress of this anchor was initiated at a load of l8Kn. I can only
assume that there was some form of contaminant on the anchor,
however it should be noted that this anchor did pass the proof load
test.
Test No |
Anchor Egress Kn. |
Load Applied Kn. |
Hole Prep |
Note |
01 |
36.0 |
46.8 |
B,A |
1 |
02 |
46.8 |
54.0 |
W,B,D |
|
03 |
25.2 |
29.0 |
F,We |
2 |
04 |
36.0 |
54.0 |
W,B,D |
|
05 |
45.0 |
52.2 |
W,B |
3 |
06 |
36.0 |
48.6 |
W,B,D |
|
07 |
23.4 |
36.8 |
B,A |
4 |
08 |
45.0 |
50.4 |
W,B,We |
|
09 |
54.0 |
54.0 |
B,A |
|
10 |
34.2 |
44.0 |
B,A |
|
11 |
18.0 |
40.0 |
B,A |
|
12 |
34.2 |
37.8 |
W,B,D |
|
Preparation code: B=Brush, A=Compressed air, D=Dried
with absorbent cloth, We=Left wet, F=Flushed only with
water.
Note:
1:Cementation of limestone particles had occurred,
difficult to clean thoroughly.
2:Only
cleaning was flushing with water.
3:Hole
was drilled vertically into floor, cleaned then filled with water,
resin was used to expel water.
4:Cementation of limestone particles had occurred,
difficult to clean thoroughly.
This test
report should be read in-conjunction with the full report
above: